rabbit anti hdac2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Rabbit Anti Hdac2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 805 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+hdac2+antibody/pmc12972989-310-45-79?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 805 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Downregulation of ClC-3 chloride channels in dorsal root ganglia neurons contributes to bone metastasis-induced pain"
Article Title: Downregulation of ClC-3 chloride channels in dorsal root ganglia neurons contributes to bone metastasis-induced pain
Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111268
Figure Legend Snippet: Identification of the involvement of HDAC2 in bone metastasis-induced pain . A – D , RT-qPCR analysis of Hdac1 ( A ), Hdac3 ( B ), Hdac8 ( C ), and Hdac2 ( D ) abundance in L4/5 DRG tissues from sham and bone metastasis model rats at 14 days after surgery. n = 7 rats per group. E and F , western blotting analysis of HDAC2 abundance in L4/5 DRG tissues from sham and bone metastasis model rats at 14 days after surgery. n = 6 rats per group. G and H , chromatin immunoprecipitation assays of HDAC2 binding to Clc-3 gene promoter in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues from sham and bone metastasis model rats at 14 days after surgery. G , representative ChIP assay result. H , summary of quantitative PCR quantification analysis. n = 8 rats per group. I – K , colocalization of HDAC2 with ClC-3 in DRG tissues. I , representative images showing the colocalization of HDAC2 with ClC-3 in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues from bone metastasis model rats and sham controls at 14 days after surgery. The scale bar represents 50 μm. J and K , violin plot shows the mean fluorescence intensity of HDAC2 ( J ) and ClC-3 ( K ) in DRG tissues from bone metastasis model rats and sham controls at 14 days after surgery. (n = 54–61 cells from three rats per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns, not significant, unpaired t test for ( A )–( K ). ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative PCR.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Fluorescence, Histone Deacetylase Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Knockdown of Hdac2 in DRG neurons increases the expression of ClC-3 channels, reduces the neuronal excitability and attenuates pain hypersensitivity in bone metastasis model rats . A , western blotting analysis of HDAC2 protein abundance in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues from intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shHDAC2 treated rats at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. n = 6 rats per group. B , chromatin immunoprecipitation assays of HDAC2 binding to Clc-3 gene promoter in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues from intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shHDAC2 treated rats at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. n = 8 rats per group. C and D , RT-qPCR analysis and western blotting analysis of ClC-3 mRNA and protein abundance in L4/5 DRG tissues from intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shHDAC2 treated rats at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. n = 4 to 6 rats per group. E – G , electrophysiological analyses of neuronal excitability in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG neurons of bone metastasis model rats that received intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shHDAC2, recorded at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. E , representative neuronal action potentials evoked by a large depolarizing current pulse (1-s, 2-fold AP rheobase) are shown. The scale bar represents 20 mV, 100 ms. F and G , plots of threshold potential and rheobase are shown. n = 10∼20 cells from 3 rats per group. H and I , assessment of ipsilateral PWT ( H ) and PWL ( I ) from intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shHDAC2 treated rats after tumor cells inoculation. n = 10 rats per group. J , assessment of animal’s locomotor function by inclined-plate test, compared before and after drug administration. n = 10 rats per group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, unpaired t test for ( A )–( G ); two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test for ( H )–( J ). DRG, dorsal root ganglion; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; LV-GFP, lentivirus expressing green fluorescent protein; PWL, paw withdrawal latency; PWT, paw withdrawal threshold; RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative PCR.
Techniques Used: Knockdown, Expressing, Western Blot, Quantitative Proteomics, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Histone Deacetylase Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Contribution of IGF1 to the activation of AKT signaling and HDAC2-mediated Clc-3 transcription repression in DRG neurons, and induces pain hypersensitivity in na39;ve rats . A and B , RT-qPCR analysis and western blotting analysis of IGF1 mRNA and protein abundance in L4/5 DRG tissues from sham and BCP rats at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. n = 4 to 8 rats per group. C – E , western blotting analysis of phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT, D ) and AKT ( E ) protein abundance in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues obtained from vehicle and IGF1-treated naïve rats. n = 6 rats per group. C , representative blots are shown. F and G , western blotting analysis of HDAC2 protein abundance in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues obtained from vehicle and IGF1-treated naïve rats. n = 6 rats per group. H – J , RT-qPCR analysis and western blotting analysis of ClC-3 mRNA and protein abundance in L4/5 DRG tissues from vehicle and IGF1-treated naïve rats. n = 4 to 8 rats per group. K and L , assessment of the PWT ( K ) and PWL ( L ) for naïve rats that received intrathecal IGF1 or vehicle, performed at 5 days after drug administration (n = 10 rats per group). M , assessment of animal’s locomotor function before and after intrathecal drug administration (n = 10 rats per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns, not significant, unpaired t test for ( A )–( J ); two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test for ( K )–( M ). BCP, bone cancer pain; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; PWL, paw withdrawal latency; PWT, paw withdrawal threshold; RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative PCR.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Quantitative Proteomics, Histone Deacetylase Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Knockdown of Igf1r in DRG neurons disrupts intrathecal IGF1-induced activation of AKT signaling as well as the upregulated expression of HDAC2, the decreased expression of ClC-3 protein and pain hypersensitivity in na9;ve rats . A and B , RT-qPCR analysis and western blotting analysis of IGF1R mRNA and protein abundance in L4/5 DRG tissues from sham and BCP rats at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. n = 6–7 rats per group. C , representative images showing the colocalization of IGF1R, HDAC2, and ClC-3 in DRG neurons. The scale bar represents 25 μm. D – F , western blotting analysis of p-AKT ( E ) and AKT ( F ) protein abundance in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues obtained from IGF1-treated naïve rats that received intrathecal LV-shIGF1R and the control LV-GFP, respectively (n = 4 rats per group). D , representative blots are shown. G – I , western blotting analysis of HDAC2 ( H ) and ClC-3 ( I ) protein abundance in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues obtained from IGF1-treated naïve rats that received intrathecal LV-shIGF1R and the control LV-GFP, respectively (n = 4 rats per group). G , representative blots are shown. J and K , assessment of ipsilateral PWT and PWL for IGF1-treated naïve rats that received intrathecal LV-shIGF1R and the control LV-GFP (n = 10 rats per group). L , assessment of animal’s locomotor function before and after intrathecal drug administration (n = 10 rats per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns, not significant, unpaired t test for ( A )–( B ); one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test for ( E )–( I ) two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test for ( J )–( L ). BCP, bone cancer pain; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LV-GFP, lentivirus expressing green fluorescent protein; p-AKT, phosphorylated AKT; PWL, paw withdrawal latency; PWT, paw withdrawal threshold; RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative PCR.
Techniques Used: Knockdown, Activation Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Quantitative Proteomics, Control, Histone Deacetylase Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Knockdown of Igf1r in DRG neurons impairs HDAC2-mediated transcriptional repression of Clc-3 gene, reduces neuronal excitability and attenuates pain hypersensitivity in bone metastasis model rats . A – E , western blotting analysis of p-AKT ( B ), AKT ( C ), HDAC2 ( D ) and ClC-3 ( E ) abundance in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG tissues from intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shIGF1R treated rats at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. n = 4 to 6 rats per group. A , representative blots are shown. F – H , electrophysiological analyses of neuronal excitability in ipsilateral L4/5 DRG neurons of bone metastasis model rats that received intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shIGF1R, recorded at 14 days after tumor cells inoculation. F , representative neuronal action potentials evoked by a large depolarizing current pulse (1-s, 2-fold AP rheobase) are shown. The scale bar represents 20 mV, 100 ms. G and H , plots of threshold potential and rheobase are shown. n = 10∼20 cells from three rats per group. I and J , assessment of ipsilateral PWT ( I ) and PWL ( J ) from intrathecal LV-GFP and LV-shIGF1R treated rats after tumor cells inoculation. n = 10 rats per group. K , assessment of animal’s locomotor function by inclined-plate test, compared before and after drug administration. n = 10 rats per group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns, not significant, unpaired t test for ( B )–( H ); two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test for ( I )–( K ). DRG, dorsal root ganglion; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; LV-GFP, lentivirus expressing green fluorescent protein; p-AKT, phosphorylated AKT; PWL, paw withdrawal latency; PWT, paw withdrawal threshold.
Techniques Used: Knockdown, Western Blot, Histone Deacetylase Assay, Expressing
